Pale barley for climate adap­tion

In crop improve­ment, control­ling chloro­phyll levels is emerging as a promising tool for enhancing resilience and reducing nitrogen require­ments.

On paper, opti­mising photo­syn­thesis looks like a game changer. Some plants, like tobacco, pota­toes and wheat, can produce 10-40% more under exper­i­mental condi­tions, while barley with reduced chloro­phyll content sees its tran­spi­ra­tion decrease by 40-50% under water stress. But can these results, obtained in the labo­ra­tory through genome modi­fi­ca­tion, be repro­duced through conven­tional breeding? In France, the Green­scale project aims to eval­uate the bene­fits of “pale” barley with reduced chloro­phyll level. This is an avenue still largely unex­plored in breeding, as lighter coloured plants are often discarded due to their asso­ci­a­tion with defi­cien­cies or diseases.

“The scien­tific liter­a­ture shows that when this pale­ness is due solely to chloro­phyll levels, yields can remain stable or even improve,” notes Fabien Chardon, project co-ordi­nator and a researcher at the Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB) in France. “In modern crops, the upper leaves often receive more light than they can use, while those at the bottom operate below theirop­timum,” he adds. At the crop stand scale, a less pigmented canopy could lead to increased light avail­ability for the lower leaves.

Two key stakes

The field trials launched this year by the Arvalis insti­tute partner in the Green­scale project aim to test low chloro­phyll lines across a variety of nutrient, water and climatic condi­tions. This data will allow simu­la­tion through model­ling of crop behav­iour and its impact on the ecosystem in multiple scenarios. The ambi­tion is twofold. Firstly, to iden­tify lines that are poten­tially more resis­tant to drought, since beyond the optimal chloro­phyll level, the plant dissi­pates excess light as heat. “The hope is that by slightly reducing pigmen­ta­tion, we can lower the canopy temper­a­ture a little, and there­fore evap­o­tran­spi­ra­tion.”

The second objec­tive is to reduce nitrogen require­ments. During the vege­ta­tive phase, half of the nitrogen in the leaves is invested in proteins that form light-harvesting complexes, which bind with chloro­phyll mole­cules. The hypoth­esis is that a less green plant will also use fewer proteins to produce these complexes. “We want to deter­mine whether this will actu­ally lead to lower nitrogen uptake, but also to under­stand how these proteins will be real­lo­cated during grain growth and filling.” This could lead to a reduc­tion in carbon foot­print and fertiliser costs. “The liter­a­ture suggests that by limiting chloro­phyll just enough so as not to affect yield, we can expect nitrogen savings of 5-10% in cereals,” says Fabien.