Inter­view: Using more home-grown sources of protein.

Alexander Döring, secre­tary general of FEFAC (the Euro­pean Feed Manu­fac­turers’ Feder­a­tion), on reducing the protein gap.

The Furrow: Mr Döring, what is the status of protein supply in Euro­pean live­stock farming?

Alexander Döring: In many protein groups our autonomy rate is very high, for example it’s almost 100% in roughage, green fodder and grain with up to 15% protein content. The debate about the protein gap is only about highly concen­trated protein sources between 30% and 50%, which in essence are rape­seed and soyabean meal. We’re at 29% autonomy there, but the trend we’re seeing is gener­ally posi­tive.

So is the deficit in this protein group not prob­lem­atic?

In my view the gap is not the problem in and of itself. But we shouldn’t be making ourselves depen­dent on one or two export coun­tries. What we should be doing is spreading the depen­dency so we can better absorb price shocks on world markets. The impor­tant thing is that we have market access to both domestic and inter­na­tional suppliers.

We need to have as compre­hen­sive a range of prod­ucts as possible.

We need to have as compre­hen­sive a range of prod­ucts as possible. For example, we are currently purchasing large volumes from neigh­bouring coun­tries around the Black Sea. That’s not the EU, but it is a start.

What is the scope for culti­vating soyabeans in Europe?

Italy has been the largest producer for years. We don’t expect any major increase there owing to the agro­nomic circum­stances. In other neigh­bouring coun­tries, like Romania, Hungary and Poland, we defi­nitely see the oppor­tu­nity to increase acreage. The non-GM protein market is bound to be an impor­tant focus for Euro­pean producers wanting to become more inde­pen­dent of imported proteins. This niche in the market could prove to be the driving force behind the expan­sion of cultivation. This may well be on a rela­tively low level, but of course we are always happy to hear of any offers coming from the member states.

And for protein plants gener­ally?

It’s very impor­tant to use more home-grown sources of protein. There is a great desire in Brus­sels and many member states to do more in this regard. The Euro­pean Commis­sion has already noted in its latest protein report that the acreage devoted both to soyabean cultivation and other legumes has already expanded signif­i­cantly over the past few years thanks to the existing mech­a­nisms provided by the CAP.

It’s very impor­tant to use more home-grown sources of protein. There is a great desire in Brus­sels and many member states to do more in this regard.

I think the issue will be consid­ered a higher priority in the agri­cul­tural policy context after 2020. There is defi­nitely greater room for protein plants as catch crops in the agri­cul­tural sector, since the part they play in crop rota­tion, for example for soil fertility, is often under­es­ti­mated.

Are oilseeds still making the largest contri­bu­tion to the high-protein sector?

Yes, they are going to play the main role in this sector for years to come – coupled with the produc­tion of sustain­able ener­gies. Rape­seed still, but sunflowers are also a major focus. Sunflower meal is now avail­able in a quality that is prac­ti­cally equal to that of soyabean meal thanks to advances in processing. Advances in breeding and processing will further improve its digestibility.

Is there any poten­tial in animal breeding?

Many scien­tists argue that animal and plant breeding will have to be tied more closely together. Up to now, much of this has run in parallel without ever coming into contact. However, the ideal util­i­sa­tion of protein sources is an issue affecting the inter­ac­tion between advances in both these fields, with research into animal nutri­tion acting as the link between them. There is still a lot of untapped poten­tial here.